CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Serial Comparison of Cancer Detection Rate Between Transrectal Ultrasound Sonography Guided Biopsy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Repeat Biopsy by a Propensity Score Matching Cohort: A Single Center Experience
Seokhwan Bang, Young Hyo Choi, Minyong Kang, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Chan Kyo Kim, Byung Kwan Park, Hyun Moo Lee
Korean J Urol Oncol. 2019;17(1):60-65.   Published online 2019 April 30    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22465/kjuo.2019.17.1.60

Excel Download

Serial Comparison of Cancer Detection Rate Between Transrectal Ultrasound Sonography Guided Biopsy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Repeat Biopsy by a Propensity Score Matching Cohort: A Single Center Experience
The Korean Journal of Urological Oncology. 2019;17(1):60-65   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Transperineal biopsy prostate cancer detection in first biopsy and repeat biopsy after negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: the Victorian Transperineal Biopsy Collaboration experience
BJU International. 2015;116(4):568-576   Crossref logo
Link1

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy With Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Urology. 2016;89:6-7   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Why and Where do We Miss Significant Prostate Cancer with Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging followed by Magnetic Resonance-guided and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men?
European Urology. 2017;71(6):896-903   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

768 Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent guided biopsy
European Urology Supplements. 2015;14(2):e768   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Prospective Study of Diagnostic Accuracy Comparing Prostate Cancer Detection by Transrectal Ultrasound–Guided Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging with Subsequent MR-guided Biopsy in Men Without Previous Prostate Biopsies
European Urology. 2014;66(1):22-29   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

The Role of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men With Unilateral Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy
Urology. 2017;102:178-182   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

MP53-09 SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE WITH SYSTEMATIC TRANSPERINEAL STEREOTACTIC PROSTATE BIOPSY PLUS MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING TARGETED, TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED FUSION BIOPSY
Journal of Urology. 2016;195(4S):   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure
BJU International. 2015;118(1):35-43   Crossref logo
Link1

Systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostrate
Clinical Imaging. 1995;19(3):227   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2